ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN KINERJA TCP DAN UDP PADA JARINGAN MPLS DAN NON-MPLS DENGAN TUNNELING L2TP/IPSEC BERDASARKAN PROTOKOLROUTING BGP, OSPF DAN RIPv2

Comparison Analysis Of TCP and UDP Performance on MPLS and Non-MPLS Networks With L2TP/IPSec Tunneling Based on BGP, OSPF, and RIPv2 Routing Protocols

Abstract

The denser data exchange activities on the internet network, of course, requires speed at the time of data
transfer, the accuracy of data reaching the recipient, and data security during the data transfer process. So the
development of network technology becomes an important thing to research. The Transmission Control Protocol (TCP)
and User Datagram Protocol (UDP) protocols at the transport layer play a role in the data transfer process. In this
study, the parameters of Quality of Service (QoS) throughput, delay, and jitter of TCP and UDP on Multiprotocol Label
Switching (MPLS) networks will be compared, MPLS combined with Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol/Internet Protocol
Security (L2TP/IPSec) and Non-MPLS based on routing protocols Open Shortest Path First (OSPF), Routing Information
Protocol version 2 (RIPv2) and Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). This research will be conducted using the Graphical
Network Simulator-3 (GNS3) simulator. Based on the research conducted, the throughput value of TCP is better than
UDP. While the weight of delay and jitter UDP is better than TCP. TCP is a protocol that prioritizes data to arrive intact
from sender to receiver. At the same time, UDP is a protocol that prioritizes speed in sending data packets from sender
to receiver. TCP and UDP QoS produced the best value on MPLS networks, followed by MPLS networks with L2TP/IPSec
tunneling and Non-MPLS. TCP and UDP on Non-MPLS, MPLS, and MPLS networks with L2TP/IPSec Tunneling have the
best QoS values in the RIPv2 routing protocol.
Keywords: TCP, UDP, MPLS, L2TP/IPSec, BGP, OSPF, RIPv2, GNS3